top of page
Search

Mirrors in the Sky: From Reflections to Spaceflight

Mirrors flipped astronomy upside down, trading heavy lenses for sleek reflectors. They started as shiny metal and evolved into high-tech glass wonders, even light enough to fly in space. Let’s trace their journey, see why they matter in telescopes, and uncover how we’ve slimmed them down without losing strength.


Early Reflections: Polished Metal Shines

Mirrors go way back. Around 4000 BCE, people in Mesopotamia polished obsidian—volcanic glass—into dark, reflective slabs. By 2000 BCE, Egyptians and Mesopotamians hammered copper into flat, shiny discs. These weren’t for telescopes—just for checking your face.


Fast forward to the Greeks. Around 300 BCE, Archimedes supposedly used bronze mirrors to focus sunlight and torch enemy ships. No proof, but it shows mirrors were getting clever. They stayed metal—bronze, silver, tin—because glass was too rough.


Glass Meets Metal: The First True Mirrors

Glass mirrors arrived late. Romans blew glass by 50 BCE, but it wasn’t reflective. Around 1300 CE, Venetian glassmakers coated glass with mercury and tin, creating clearer mirrors.


These were small, fragile, and dim—useless for astronomy.


By the 1500s, mirrors improved with silvering—coating glass with silver nitrate. Still, they tarnished fast and stayed decorative. Telescopes? Not yet—lenses ruled the early 1600s.


Astronomy’s Mirror Moment: Newton Steps In

In 1668, Isaac Newton changed everything. Tired of chromatic aberration (colour blur) in lens-based refractors, he built the first reflecting telescope. His mirror? A 1.3-inch disc of speculum—a tin-copper alloy—polished to a curve.


  • How It Worked: Light hit the speculum, bounced to a flat secondary mirror, and reached the eyepiece.

  • Why It Mattered: No colour distortion, and mirrors could grow bigger than lenses without sagging.


Speculum was heavy and dulled quickly, needing repolishing. Glass wasn’t reflective yet—metal led the way.


Glass Takes Over: Silvered Mirrors

By the 1850s, glass caught up. German chemist Justus von Liebig perfected silvering—coating glass with a thin silver layer via a chemical bath. This made mirrors lighter, sharper, and easier to shape than metal slabs.


  • Astronomy Boost: Big silvered-glass mirrors, like William Herschel’s 40-foot reflector (1789, later upgraded), spied faint nebulae.

  • Downside: Silver tarnished, and glass was still bulky—think pounds of material.


Glass mirrors became the go-to for big telescopes, but weight was a headache.


Bigger and Better: Reflectors Rule

The 20th century saw mirrors grow massive. The 100-inch Hooker Telescope (1917) used a 4-ton glass mirror. The 200-inch Hale Telescope (1948) upped it to 14.5 tons. These giants captured distant galaxies, proving reflectors could outshine refractors.


  • Problem: Tons of glass meant huge, costly mounts—and forget spaceflight.


Slimming Down: Honeycomb and Thin Mirrors

By the 1980s, glass got smarter. For ground telescopes like the Keck Observatory (1990s), engineers hollowed out mirrors into a honeycomb structure—hexagonal cells behind a thin glass face. The 10-meter Keck mirror weighs “only” 7 tons, half the Hale’s mass.


  • How: Molten glass was poured over ceramic molds, cooling into a lightweight lattice.

  • Benefit: Big light collection, less weight, solid integrity.


Thin mirrors went further. Spun while molten, they curved naturally, cutting thickness to inches. Actuators bent them to fix distortion, keeping them sturdy.


Spaceflight Challenge: Mirrors Go Orbital

Space telescopes like Hubble (1990) demanded featherweight mirrors. Hubble’s 2.4-meter mirror, a Ritchey-Chrétien design, used honeycomb glass—1,800 pounds instead of tons. Launched on the Space Shuttle, it proved mirrors could fly.


  • Trick: Ultra-precise grinding and a rigid-but-light frame.

  • Limit: Still heavy by space standards; bigger was riskier.


Weight was slashed, but space craved more.


Featherweight Future: Beryllium and Segments

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), launched 2021, rewrote the rules. Its 6.5-meter mirror uses 18 hexagonal segments of beryllium—a metal lighter than glass (density 1.85 g/cm³ vs. glass’s 2.5 g/cm³). Coated with gold for infrared, each segment weighs just 46 pounds.


  • How It’s Light: Beryllium’s strength-to-weight ratio beats glass; segments fold for launch, then unfold in space.

  • Why It Works: Total mirror mass is 1,375 pounds—half of Hubble’s—yet it’s nearly three times wider.


Structural integrity? Thin ribs and a carbon-fiber frame keep it stiff in zero-G.


Overcoming Gravity: Modern Fixes

Glass’s heft is tamed three ways:


  1. Honeycomb: Hollow cores drop weight, used in Keck and Hubble.

  2. Thin Shells: Spun or slumped glass, flexed by actuators, cuts mass.

  3. New Materials: Beryllium (JWST) or silicon carbide (future scopes) ditch glass’s density.


For space, every ounce counts. JWST’s segments launched folded, proving big mirrors can soar. Ground giants like the 39-meter Extremely Large Telescope (2020s) use hundreds of thin glass segments—light, strong, and adjustable.


Mirrors Today and Tomorrow

From copper discs to beryllium hexagons, mirrors evolved to outshine lenses in astronomy. They’ve shed weight through hollowing, thinning, and material swaps, keeping the strength to probe stars, exoplanets, and dark energy. Next up? Even lighter composites or inflatable mirrors in space. Reflections keep revealing the universe!

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Tel: 01547 520247

Llanshay Lane

Kinghton

Powys

LD7 1LW

location map for the Spaceguard Centre

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to get Spaceguard Centre news and updates.

FOLLOW US

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • TikTok

DONATIONS

We are not a Government funded project. We rely on donations to maintain the observatory and to continue our operations.

© 2025 by Aandragon. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page